Proposition 127 -

Summary

This proposition would amend the Arizona constitution to gradually increase the amount of energy derived from renewable sources (i.e. solar and wind) to 50% by 2030. The amendment would also require that distributed renewable energy sources, including rooftop solar energy and other forms of energy that minimize reliance on large-scale power plants, constitute at least 10% of utilities’ annual electricity sales by 2030.

A “yes” vote requires electric utilities in Arizona to get at least 50% of their electricity from renewable resources by 2030.

A “no” vote maintains current renewable energy goals. Electric utilities would be required to get 15% of their electricity from renewable resources by 2025.

Arguments

According to Howard Fischer of Pinal Central, the measure would cause the average residential bill to increase by over 116% because the new law would shut down many nuclear plants due to lower demand for non-solar energy during peak (daytime) hours., in opposition to Proposition 127 (Learn more)

The Natural Resources Defense Council found in a study that average electric bills would be three dollars less per month by 2030 if this measue is passed., in support of Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, renewable energy sources are often cheaper than fossil fuels. This ballot measure alone could reduce statewide electricity costs by over $4 billion., in support of Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the Arizona Solar Center, Arizona could lose millions of dollars in property tax revenues should this amendment pass, as Arizona currently does not tax homeowners for any increase in property value associated with installing solar and renewable energy devices. This exemption applies to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, meaning that the government would lose money on property tax revenues should this measure be passed., in opposition to Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the Goldwater Institute, this amendment would disproportionately affect rural communities, as several rural utilities would be forced to shut down because of the significant costs associated with implementing the necessary technology to shift to a renewable energy scheme., in opposition to Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the In Defense of Liberty Blog, if this measure passes, it could cost people working in non-renewable energy, including fossil fuels and nuclear energy, their jobs., in opposition to Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the In Defense of Liberty Blog, consumers should have the choice as to whether or not to use renewable energy. It should not be mandated by the state constitution., in opposition to Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to the Clean Energy for a Healthy Arizona Committee, clean energy reduces air pollution and can limit cases of asthma and lung disease. This will not only improve the general health of Arizona residents, but also improve workplace productivity by driving down the number of sick days., in support of Proposition 127 (Learn more)

According to Yes On 127, Arizona is considered one of the sunniest states in the United States, with over 300 days of sun each year, making it all the more important to take advantage of solar energy. , in support of Proposition 127 (Learn more)

Measure Details